Efixera

Solution — construction, design & EPC

The project spine on the record: WBS, budget vs actual, and field supervision that gates covering work.

A design institute, EPC contractor, or supervision firm tallies budget vs actual by hand, keeps АОСР inspection acts on paper disconnected from the schedule, and circulates drawings by email with no enforced current version. Efixera leads with e-PMS: a Work Breakdown Structure with man-hour budget and Earned Value Management, plus author and technical field supervision — with e-EDMS document control and e-CRM/e-Bid pre-contract underneath. Adopted module by module, not as a multi-year program.

Diagram of an abstract structural frame with one joint linked to an inspection checkmark, representing the construction/EPC solution.

Pains → what closes them

The problems, by module

Project budget vs actual is tallied by hand at month-end

e-PMS records man-hour budget and Earned Value Management (PV/EV/AC, CPI/SPI, EAC/ETC/VAC forecast) in real time on a Work Breakdown Structure.

Field inspection acts (АОСР) live on paper, disconnected from the schedule

e-PMS Technical Supervision records АОСР inspection acts with a covering-work gate — work cannot be marked covered without a passed inspection.

Drawings and revisions circulate by email with no enforced current version

e-EDMS (DCC) enforces one current version per the document-control procedure and tracks revisions across projects.

A field deviation isn't traced back to the task or drawing that caused it

Author Surveillance logs e-signed field change orders and deviation reports, linked to the task and its document through the Integration Bridge.

Compliance fit

Audit-ready by design

  • Design-supervision and document-control mandates
  • АОСР inspection-act and covering-work evidence
  • Tender-regime bid-to-contract record

FAQ

Common questions

Is this built for construction/design work, or is it a generic PM tool?

It natively speaks WBS man-hour budgeting, Earned Value Management, АОСР inspection acts, covering-work gates, and field deviation reports — the project-execution and supervision vocabulary of design institutes, EPC contractors, and supervision firms, not a generic task tracker.

Can we start with just project execution, before supervision or bid-to-contract?

Yes. Adoption is module by module — start with e-PMS project execution (WBS, budget, EVM), then add Technical/Author Supervision or e-CRM/e-Bid pre-contract on the same login and access model.

How is a covering-work gate enforced?

Technical Supervision requires a passed inspection act before a work item can be marked covered — the gate is enforced in the workflow, not left to a checklist.

Put the project spine — budget, schedule, and supervision — on the record.

Tell us where the record breaks down — budget, drawings, or field supervision — and we will scope a first-module walkthrough.